Freelance vs Salary — What Rate Do You Actually Need to Break Even?
Comparing a $90K salary to a $90/hr freelance rate is not apples to apples. This guide shows you the true cost of employment and what you need to charge to match a full-time salary.
The comparison most people get wrong
When someone leaves a $90,000 job to freelance, they often assume they need to earn $90,000 as a freelancer to break even. They don't — they need to earn significantly more. But not as much as they think, because they stop paying for some things too.
What your employer pays that you don't see
Your salary is not your total employment cost. Employers typically pay employer payroll taxes (roughly 7.65% in the US), health insurance ($5,000–$15,000/year), retirement contributions (3–6% match), paid leave, and equipment and training.
For a $90K salaried employee, total employment cost is typically $110,000–$130,000/year. That's the real cost of your labour.
The break-even calculation
To genuinely break even versus a $90K role with typical US benefits, you need to gross approximately:
- $90K net target ÷ (1 – 0.28 tax rate) = $125K gross
- + $8K health insurance (self-paid)
- + $5K retirement contributions
- + $5K equipment and software
- = $143K gross annual revenue needed
When freelancing wins financially
Freelancing beats employment when you can charge market rates that exceed your employment cost, your billable ratio is above 65%, you have consistent clients, and you use available tax deductions aggressively.
It usually doesn't win in year one. Year 2–3 is when the economics shift clearly in favour of freelancing.
The practical rule of thumb
Your minimum freelance rate should be at least 1.5–2× your effective employee hourly rate. If you earned $90K as an employee, your effective hourly rate was roughly $45/hr — meaning your freelance floor should be $67–$90/hr before considering profit.
Use the calculator on this site to get your precise number based on your actual situation.
Ready to calculate your rate?
Use the free calculator →